Maxim Lugovskoy vs Maciej Swicarz
27. Czech Open A 2016, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maxim Lugovskoy vs Maciej Swicarz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maxim Lugovskoy (2458)
- Black
- Maciej Swicarz (2292)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 27. Czech Open A 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maxim Lugovskoy (2458) and Maciej Swicarz (2292) was played at 27. Czech Open A 2016 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maxim Lugovskoy games or Maciej Swicarz games? This Maxim Lugovskoy vs Maciej Swicarz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maxim Lugovskoy vs Maciej Swicarz?
Maxim Lugovskoy vs Maciej Swicarz (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Maxim Lugovskoy vs Maciej Swicarz?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maxim Lugovskoy vs Maciej Swicarz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.