Matthias Luetzen vs Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann
date unknown · Result 0–1 · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matthias Luetzen vs Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matthias Luetzen (2056)
- Black
- Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann (1801)
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matthias Luetzen (2056) and Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann (1801) was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matthias Luetzen games or Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann games? This Matthias Luetzen vs Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matthias Luetzen vs Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann?
Matthias Luetzen vs Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann finished 0–1, a win for Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann.
What opening was played in Matthias Luetzen vs Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matthias Luetzen vs Wolfgang A. F. Hartmann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.