Robert, Dr. Lueder vs Stefan Kiechl
Greifswald Open 3rd, 2005 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert, Dr. Lueder vs Stefan Kiechl with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert, Dr. Lueder (1614)
- Black
- Stefan Kiechl (1929)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Greifswald Open 3rd
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert, Dr. Lueder (1614) and Stefan Kiechl (1929) was played at Greifswald Open 3rd in 2005 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert, Dr. Lueder games or Stefan Kiechl games? This Robert, Dr. Lueder vs Stefan Kiechl encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert, Dr. Lueder vs Stefan Kiechl?
Robert, Dr. Lueder vs Stefan Kiechl (2005) finished 0–1, a win for Stefan Kiechl.
What opening was played in Robert, Dr. Lueder vs Stefan Kiechl?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert, Dr. Lueder vs Stefan Kiechl, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.