Arnolds Luckans vs Roland Berzinsh
ch-LAT, 2005 · Result ½–½ · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arnolds Luckans vs Roland Berzinsh with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arnolds Luckans (2452)
- Black
- Roland Berzinsh (2457)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ch-LAT
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arnolds Luckans (2452) and Roland Berzinsh (2457) was played at ch-LAT in 2005 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arnolds Luckans games or Roland Berzinsh games? This Arnolds Luckans vs Roland Berzinsh encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arnolds Luckans vs Roland Berzinsh?
Arnolds Luckans vs Roland Berzinsh (2005) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Arnolds Luckans vs Roland Berzinsh?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arnolds Luckans vs Roland Berzinsh, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.