Alejandro Lucea Valero vs Fernando Salamero Pelay
2010 · Result ½–½ · Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alejandro Lucea Valero vs Fernando Salamero Pelay with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alejandro Lucea Valero (1964)
- Black
- Fernando Salamero Pelay (2131)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alejandro Lucea Valero (1964) and Fernando Salamero Pelay (2131) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alejandro Lucea Valero games or Fernando Salamero Pelay games? This Alejandro Lucea Valero vs Fernando Salamero Pelay encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alejandro Lucea Valero vs Fernando Salamero Pelay?
Alejandro Lucea Valero vs Fernando Salamero Pelay (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alejandro Lucea Valero vs Fernando Salamero Pelay?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (ECO A49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alejandro Lucea Valero vs Fernando Salamero Pelay, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.