Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado vs Juan Luis Asensio Diaz
2008 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado vs Juan Luis Asensio Diaz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado (1612)
- Black
- Juan Luis Asensio Diaz (1785)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado (1612) and Juan Luis Asensio Diaz (1785) was played in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (D13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado games or Juan Luis Asensio Diaz games? This Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado vs Juan Luis Asensio Diaz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado vs Juan Luis Asensio Diaz?
Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado vs Juan Luis Asensio Diaz (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado vs Juan Luis Asensio Diaz?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Carlos Lozano Dorado vs Juan Luis Asensio Diaz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.