Petar Lovric vs Emanuel Skvorc
21. Bosnjaci Open, 2016 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Petar Lovric vs Emanuel Skvorc with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Petar Lovric (2073)
- Black
- Emanuel Skvorc (1929)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 21. Bosnjaci Open
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Petar Lovric (2073) and Emanuel Skvorc (1929) was played at 21. Bosnjaci Open in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Petar Lovric games or Emanuel Skvorc games? This Petar Lovric vs Emanuel Skvorc encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Petar Lovric vs Emanuel Skvorc?
Petar Lovric vs Emanuel Skvorc (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Emanuel Skvorc.
What opening was played in Petar Lovric vs Emanuel Skvorc?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Petar Lovric vs Emanuel Skvorc, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.