Franjo Lovakovic vs Dmitrij Sutkalenko
SM-00205, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Franjo Lovakovic vs Dmitrij Sutkalenko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Franjo Lovakovic (2352)
- Black
- Dmitrij Sutkalenko (2363)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- SM-00205
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Franjo Lovakovic (2352) and Dmitrij Sutkalenko (2363) was played at SM-00205 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Franjo Lovakovic games or Dmitrij Sutkalenko games? This Franjo Lovakovic vs Dmitrij Sutkalenko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Franjo Lovakovic vs Dmitrij Sutkalenko?
Franjo Lovakovic vs Dmitrij Sutkalenko (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Franjo Lovakovic.
What opening was played in Franjo Lovakovic vs Dmitrij Sutkalenko?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Franjo Lovakovic vs Dmitrij Sutkalenko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.