Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary vs Damien Vincent
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary vs Damien Vincent with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary (2090)
- Black
- Damien Vincent (2085)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary (2090) and Damien Vincent (2085) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary games or Damien Vincent games? This Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary vs Damien Vincent encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary vs Damien Vincent?
Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary vs Damien Vincent finished 1–0, a win for Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary.
What opening was played in Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary vs Damien Vincent?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (ECO D35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matthieu Louvrier Saint-Mary vs Damien Vincent, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.