Rastko Lorger vs Josef Skoberne
SLO Ch U20, 2002 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rastko Lorger vs Josef Skoberne with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rastko Lorger (1874)
- Black
- Josef Skoberne
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- SLO Ch U20
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rastko Lorger (1874) and Josef Skoberne was played at SLO Ch U20 in 2002 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rastko Lorger games or Josef Skoberne games? This Rastko Lorger vs Josef Skoberne encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rastko Lorger vs Josef Skoberne?
Rastko Lorger vs Josef Skoberne (2002) finished 0–1, a win for Josef Skoberne.
What opening was played in Rastko Lorger vs Josef Skoberne?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rastko Lorger vs Josef Skoberne, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.