Luis Angel Lopez Vilier vs Victor Rodriguez Garcia
2009 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Angel Lopez Vilier vs Victor Rodriguez Garcia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Angel Lopez Vilier (2246)
- Black
- Victor Rodriguez Garcia (2324)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Angel Lopez Vilier (2246) and Victor Rodriguez Garcia (2324) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Angel Lopez Vilier games or Victor Rodriguez Garcia games? This Luis Angel Lopez Vilier vs Victor Rodriguez Garcia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Angel Lopez Vilier vs Victor Rodriguez Garcia?
Luis Angel Lopez Vilier vs Victor Rodriguez Garcia (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Luis Angel Lopez Vilier vs Victor Rodriguez Garcia?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (ECO A96).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Angel Lopez Vilier vs Victor Rodriguez Garcia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.