Oscar Lopez Santana vs Marc Cros Garcia
TCh-CAT GpB Final 2019, 2019 · Result 1–0 · King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense (C36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oscar Lopez Santana vs Marc Cros Garcia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oscar Lopez Santana (2082)
- Black
- Marc Cros Garcia (1909)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-CAT GpB Final 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense (C36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oscar Lopez Santana (2082) and Marc Cros Garcia (1909) was played at TCh-CAT GpB Final 2019 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense (C36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oscar Lopez Santana games or Marc Cros Garcia games? This Oscar Lopez Santana vs Marc Cros Garcia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oscar Lopez Santana vs Marc Cros Garcia?
Oscar Lopez Santana vs Marc Cros Garcia (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Oscar Lopez Santana.
What opening was played in Oscar Lopez Santana vs Marc Cros Garcia?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: Modern Defense (ECO C36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oscar Lopez Santana vs Marc Cros Garcia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.