Xavier Lopez Roca vs Angel Lazaro Porta
2000 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Xavier Lopez Roca vs Angel Lazaro Porta with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Xavier Lopez Roca (2142)
- Black
- Angel Lazaro Porta (2073)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Xavier Lopez Roca (2142) and Angel Lazaro Porta (2073) was played in 2000 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Xavier Lopez Roca games or Angel Lazaro Porta games? This Xavier Lopez Roca vs Angel Lazaro Porta encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Xavier Lopez Roca vs Angel Lazaro Porta?
Xavier Lopez Roca vs Angel Lazaro Porta (2000) finished 1–0, a win for Xavier Lopez Roca.
What opening was played in Xavier Lopez Roca vs Angel Lazaro Porta?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (ECO D87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Xavier Lopez Roca vs Angel Lazaro Porta, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.