Juan David Lopez Perdomo vs Juan Camilo Torres
2015 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan David Lopez Perdomo vs Juan Camilo Torres with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan David Lopez Perdomo (1969)
- Black
- Juan Camilo Torres (2300)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan David Lopez Perdomo (1969) and Juan Camilo Torres (2300) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan David Lopez Perdomo games or Juan Camilo Torres games? This Juan David Lopez Perdomo vs Juan Camilo Torres encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan David Lopez Perdomo vs Juan Camilo Torres?
Juan David Lopez Perdomo vs Juan Camilo Torres (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Juan Camilo Torres.
What opening was played in Juan David Lopez Perdomo vs Juan Camilo Torres?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan David Lopez Perdomo vs Juan Camilo Torres, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.