Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez vs Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera
2016 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense (D10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez vs Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez (2083)
- Black
- Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera (2059)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Slav Defense (D10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez (2083) and Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera (2059) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense (D10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez games or Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera games? This Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez vs Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez vs Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera?
Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez vs Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez vs Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera?
The game opened with the Slav Defense (ECO D10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Angel Lopez de Turiso Sanchez vs Eduardo Gonzalez Rivera, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.