David Lopez Caudevilla vs Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio
2017 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Lopez Caudevilla vs Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Lopez Caudevilla (2073)
- Black
- Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio (2032)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Lopez Caudevilla (2073) and Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio (2032) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Lopez Caudevilla games or Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio games? This David Lopez Caudevilla vs Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Lopez Caudevilla vs Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio?
David Lopez Caudevilla vs Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio (2017) finished 1–0, a win for David Lopez Caudevilla.
What opening was played in David Lopez Caudevilla vs Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Lopez Caudevilla vs Juan Miguel Martinez Asensio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.