Pedro Lopez Ayala vs Jose Nieto Rubio
2007 · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pedro Lopez Ayala vs Jose Nieto Rubio with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pedro Lopez Ayala (1968)
- Black
- Jose Nieto Rubio (1922)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pedro Lopez Ayala (1968) and Jose Nieto Rubio (1922) was played in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pedro Lopez Ayala games or Jose Nieto Rubio games? This Pedro Lopez Ayala vs Jose Nieto Rubio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pedro Lopez Ayala vs Jose Nieto Rubio?
Pedro Lopez Ayala vs Jose Nieto Rubio (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Pedro Lopez Ayala.
What opening was played in Pedro Lopez Ayala vs Jose Nieto Rubio?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pedro Lopez Ayala vs Jose Nieto Rubio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.