Philippe Lombart vs Antonio Castrovillari
CP.2006.P.00024, 2006 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Philippe Lombart vs Antonio Castrovillari with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Philippe Lombart (2097)
- Black
- Antonio Castrovillari (800)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- CP.2006.P.00024
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Philippe Lombart (2097) and Antonio Castrovillari (800) was played at CP.2006.P.00024 in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Philippe Lombart games or Antonio Castrovillari games? This Philippe Lombart vs Antonio Castrovillari encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Philippe Lombart vs Antonio Castrovillari?
Philippe Lombart vs Antonio Castrovillari (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Philippe Lombart vs Antonio Castrovillari?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Philippe Lombart vs Antonio Castrovillari, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.