Sergei Lobanov vs Leif Erlend Johannessen
European Blitz 2015, 2015 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Classical Variation (C11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sergei Lobanov vs Leif Erlend Johannessen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sergei Lobanov (2457)
- Black
- Leif Erlend Johannessen (2487)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- European Blitz 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation (C11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sergei Lobanov (2457) and Leif Erlend Johannessen (2487) was played at European Blitz 2015 in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation (C11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sergei Lobanov games or Leif Erlend Johannessen games? This Sergei Lobanov vs Leif Erlend Johannessen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sergei Lobanov vs Leif Erlend Johannessen?
Sergei Lobanov vs Leif Erlend Johannessen (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Leif Erlend Johannessen.
What opening was played in Sergei Lobanov vs Leif Erlend Johannessen?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation (ECO C11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sergei Lobanov vs Leif Erlend Johannessen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.