Santiago Loaiza Cuervo vs Leandro Jimenez Jimenez
17. American Continental, 2024 · Result 0–1 · Petrov's Defense (C42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Santiago Loaiza Cuervo vs Leandro Jimenez Jimenez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Santiago Loaiza Cuervo (1962)
- Black
- Leandro Jimenez Jimenez (2189)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 17. American Continental
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense (C42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Santiago Loaiza Cuervo (1962) and Leandro Jimenez Jimenez (2189) was played at 17. American Continental in 2024 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Petrov's Defense (C42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Santiago Loaiza Cuervo games or Leandro Jimenez Jimenez games? This Santiago Loaiza Cuervo vs Leandro Jimenez Jimenez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Santiago Loaiza Cuervo vs Leandro Jimenez Jimenez?
Santiago Loaiza Cuervo vs Leandro Jimenez Jimenez (2024) finished 0–1, a win for Leandro Jimenez Jimenez.
What opening was played in Santiago Loaiza Cuervo vs Leandro Jimenez Jimenez?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense (ECO C42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Santiago Loaiza Cuervo vs Leandro Jimenez Jimenez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.