Jose Luis Llorente vs Lavas Luers
RA-00389, 2015 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Luis Llorente vs Lavas Luers with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Luis Llorente (2122)
- Black
- Lavas Luers (2000)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- RA-00389
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Luis Llorente (2122) and Lavas Luers (2000) was played at RA-00389 in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (B97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Luis Llorente games or Lavas Luers games? This Jose Luis Llorente vs Lavas Luers encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Luis Llorente vs Lavas Luers?
Jose Luis Llorente vs Lavas Luers (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Lavas Luers.
What opening was played in Jose Luis Llorente vs Lavas Luers?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Variation (ECO B97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Luis Llorente vs Lavas Luers, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.