Alberto J P Lixa vs Stephen V Woodhouse
WS/O/914, 2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alberto J P Lixa vs Stephen V Woodhouse with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alberto J P Lixa (1817)
- Black
- Stephen V Woodhouse (1878)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/O/914
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alberto J P Lixa (1817) and Stephen V Woodhouse (1878) was played at WS/O/914 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alberto J P Lixa games or Stephen V Woodhouse games? This Alberto J P Lixa vs Stephen V Woodhouse encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alberto J P Lixa vs Stephen V Woodhouse?
Alberto J P Lixa vs Stephen V Woodhouse (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Alberto J P Lixa.
What opening was played in Alberto J P Lixa vs Stephen V Woodhouse?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (ECO C07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alberto J P Lixa vs Stephen V Woodhouse, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.