Alberto J P Lixa vs José Luis Bernal Caamaño
DJ-CT18/pr63, 2011 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Advance Variation (C02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alberto J P Lixa vs José Luis Bernal Caamaño with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alberto J P Lixa (1886)
- Black
- José Luis Bernal Caamaño (1799)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- DJ-CT18/pr63
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- French Defense: Advance Variation (C02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alberto J P Lixa (1886) and José Luis Bernal Caamaño (1799) was played at DJ-CT18/pr63 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Advance Variation (C02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alberto J P Lixa games or José Luis Bernal Caamaño games? This Alberto J P Lixa vs José Luis Bernal Caamaño encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alberto J P Lixa vs José Luis Bernal Caamaño?
Alberto J P Lixa vs José Luis Bernal Caamaño (2011) finished 0–1, a win for José Luis Bernal Caamaño.
What opening was played in Alberto J P Lixa vs José Luis Bernal Caamaño?
The game opened with the French Defense: Advance Variation (ECO C02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alberto J P Lixa vs José Luis Bernal Caamaño, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.