Jacob Liu vs Nicholas Warner
Cambridge International Open 3rd, 2025 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacob Liu vs Nicholas Warner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacob Liu (1825)
- Black
- Nicholas Warner (1741)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Cambridge International Open 3rd
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacob Liu (1825) and Nicholas Warner (1741) was played at Cambridge International Open 3rd in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacob Liu games or Nicholas Warner games? This Jacob Liu vs Nicholas Warner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacob Liu vs Nicholas Warner?
Jacob Liu vs Nicholas Warner (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Jacob Liu.
What opening was played in Jacob Liu vs Nicholas Warner?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacob Liu vs Nicholas Warner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.