Dennis Liu vs Christoph Menezes
2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dennis Liu vs Christoph Menezes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dennis Liu (1735)
- Black
- Christoph Menezes (1947)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dennis Liu (1735) and Christoph Menezes (1947) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dennis Liu games or Christoph Menezes games? This Dennis Liu vs Christoph Menezes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dennis Liu vs Christoph Menezes?
Dennis Liu vs Christoph Menezes (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Christoph Menezes.
What opening was played in Dennis Liu vs Christoph Menezes?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (ECO B73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dennis Liu vs Christoph Menezes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.