Eason Liu vs Michael Lee
US Junior Closed, 2009 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Eason Liu vs Michael Lee with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Eason Liu (2356)
- Black
- Michael Lee (2371)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- US Junior Closed
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99)
About this chess game
This chess game between Eason Liu (2356) and Michael Lee (2371) was played at US Junior Closed in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Eason Liu games or Michael Lee games? This Eason Liu vs Michael Lee encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Eason Liu vs Michael Lee?
Eason Liu vs Michael Lee (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Eason Liu vs Michael Lee?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (ECO E99).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Eason Liu vs Michael Lee, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.