Valery Lisik vs Laszlo Zila
Spring, 1992 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Valery Lisik vs Laszlo Zila with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Valery Lisik (2475)
- Black
- Laszlo Zila (2210)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Spring
- Year
- 1992
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99)
About this chess game
This chess game between Valery Lisik (2475) and Laszlo Zila (2210) was played at Spring in 1992 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Valery Lisik games or Laszlo Zila games? This Valery Lisik vs Laszlo Zila encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Valery Lisik vs Laszlo Zila?
Valery Lisik vs Laszlo Zila (1992) finished 1–0, a win for Valery Lisik.
What opening was played in Valery Lisik vs Laszlo Zila?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (ECO E99).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Valery Lisik vs Laszlo Zila, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.