Rogelio Linskens vs Roberto Alvarez
Corr ch14-ARG, 1989 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rogelio Linskens vs Roberto Alvarez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rogelio Linskens
- Black
- Roberto Alvarez (2131)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr ch14-ARG
- Year
- 1989
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rogelio Linskens and Roberto Alvarez (2131) was played at Corr ch14-ARG in 1989 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rogelio Linskens games or Roberto Alvarez games? This Rogelio Linskens vs Roberto Alvarez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rogelio Linskens vs Roberto Alvarez?
Rogelio Linskens vs Roberto Alvarez (1989) finished 0–1, a win for Roberto Alvarez.
What opening was played in Rogelio Linskens vs Roberto Alvarez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (ECO B71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rogelio Linskens vs Roberto Alvarez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.