Peter Lindegaard vs Lars Kirstein Andersen
DM 2020 (DEN), 2020 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Lindegaard vs Lars Kirstein Andersen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Lindegaard (2044)
- Black
- Lars Kirstein Andersen (1536)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- DM 2020 (DEN)
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Lindegaard (2044) and Lars Kirstein Andersen (1536) was played at DM 2020 (DEN) in 2020 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Lindegaard games or Lars Kirstein Andersen games? This Peter Lindegaard vs Lars Kirstein Andersen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Lindegaard vs Lars Kirstein Andersen?
Peter Lindegaard vs Lars Kirstein Andersen (2020) finished 1–0, a win for Peter Lindegaard.
What opening was played in Peter Lindegaard vs Lars Kirstein Andersen?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Lindegaard vs Lars Kirstein Andersen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.