Tamas Ligart vs Barnabas Bujdoso
2014 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tamas Ligart vs Barnabas Bujdoso with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tamas Ligart (2211)
- Black
- Barnabas Bujdoso (1963)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tamas Ligart (2211) and Barnabas Bujdoso (1963) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tamas Ligart games or Barnabas Bujdoso games? This Tamas Ligart vs Barnabas Bujdoso encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tamas Ligart vs Barnabas Bujdoso?
Tamas Ligart vs Barnabas Bujdoso (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Tamas Ligart vs Barnabas Bujdoso?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tamas Ligart vs Barnabas Bujdoso, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.