Fabien Libiszewski vs David Pires Tavares Martins
London Classic Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12).
Analyze this game
Open Fabien Libiszewski vs David Pires Tavares Martins on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fabien Libiszewski (2547)
- Black
- David Pires Tavares Martins (2382)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- London Classic Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fabien Libiszewski (2547) and David Pires Tavares Martins (2382) was played at London Classic Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fabien Libiszewski games or David Pires Tavares Martins games? This Fabien Libiszewski vs David Pires Tavares Martins encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fabien Libiszewski vs David Pires Tavares Martins?
Fabien Libiszewski vs David Pires Tavares Martins (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Fabien Libiszewski.
What opening was played in Fabien Libiszewski vs David Pires Tavares Martins?
The game opened with the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (ECO C12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fabien Libiszewski vs David Pires Tavares Martins, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.