Gil Leyva vs Marcel Sisniega Campbell
FIDE Acatl n, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gil Leyva vs Marcel Sisniega Campbell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gil Leyva
- Black
- Marcel Sisniega Campbell (2440)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FIDE Acatl n
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gil Leyva and Marcel Sisniega Campbell (2440) was played at FIDE Acatl n and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gil Leyva games or Marcel Sisniega Campbell games? This Gil Leyva vs Marcel Sisniega Campbell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gil Leyva vs Marcel Sisniega Campbell?
Gil Leyva vs Marcel Sisniega Campbell finished 0–1, a win for Marcel Sisniega Campbell.
What opening was played in Gil Leyva vs Marcel Sisniega Campbell?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (ECO B45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gil Leyva vs Marcel Sisniega Campbell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.