Joseph Lewi vs Nikolai V Krogius
Rubinstein Memorial, 1969 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joseph Lewi vs Nikolai V Krogius with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joseph Lewi (1557)
- Black
- Nikolai V Krogius
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Rubinstein Memorial
- Year
- 1969
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joseph Lewi (1557) and Nikolai V Krogius was played at Rubinstein Memorial in 1969 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joseph Lewi games or Nikolai V Krogius games? This Joseph Lewi vs Nikolai V Krogius encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joseph Lewi vs Nikolai V Krogius?
Joseph Lewi vs Nikolai V Krogius (1969) finished 0–1, a win for Nikolai V Krogius.
What opening was played in Joseph Lewi vs Nikolai V Krogius?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joseph Lewi vs Nikolai V Krogius, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.