Anika Lewandowska vs Dominika Jelonek
2013 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anika Lewandowska vs Dominika Jelonek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anika Lewandowska (1949)
- Black
- Dominika Jelonek (1885)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anika Lewandowska (1949) and Dominika Jelonek (1885) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anika Lewandowska games or Dominika Jelonek games? This Anika Lewandowska vs Dominika Jelonek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anika Lewandowska vs Dominika Jelonek?
Anika Lewandowska vs Dominika Jelonek (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Anika Lewandowska.
What opening was played in Anika Lewandowska vs Dominika Jelonek?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (ECO E38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anika Lewandowska vs Dominika Jelonek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.