Felix Levin vs Jens Kotainy
2013 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Felix Levin vs Jens Kotainy with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Felix Levin (2512)
- Black
- Jens Kotainy (2413)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Felix Levin (2512) and Jens Kotainy (2413) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Felix Levin games or Jens Kotainy games? This Felix Levin vs Jens Kotainy encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Felix Levin vs Jens Kotainy?
Felix Levin vs Jens Kotainy (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Felix Levin vs Jens Kotainy?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (ECO A32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Felix Levin vs Jens Kotainy, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.