Jean-Claude Letzelter vs Paul Limbos
1972 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jean-Claude Letzelter vs Paul Limbos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jean-Claude Letzelter (2255)
- Black
- Paul Limbos
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 1972
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jean-Claude Letzelter (2255) and Paul Limbos was played in 1972 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jean-Claude Letzelter games or Paul Limbos games? This Jean-Claude Letzelter vs Paul Limbos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jean-Claude Letzelter vs Paul Limbos?
Jean-Claude Letzelter vs Paul Limbos (1972) finished 0–1, a win for Paul Limbos.
What opening was played in Jean-Claude Letzelter vs Paul Limbos?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (ECO C59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jean-Claude Letzelter vs Paul Limbos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.