Alexandre Lesiege vs Samuel Song
CAN Ch 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandre Lesiege vs Samuel Song with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandre Lesiege (2525)
- Black
- Samuel Song (2182)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CAN Ch 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandre Lesiege (2525) and Samuel Song (2182) was played at CAN Ch 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandre Lesiege games or Samuel Song games? This Alexandre Lesiege vs Samuel Song encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandre Lesiege vs Samuel Song?
Alexandre Lesiege vs Samuel Song (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Alexandre Lesiege.
What opening was played in Alexandre Lesiege vs Samuel Song?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (ECO E33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandre Lesiege vs Samuel Song, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.