Livio Lepri vs Andrea Trebeschi
Weekend Vitinia, date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Livio Lepri vs Andrea Trebeschi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Livio Lepri (1999)
- Black
- Andrea Trebeschi (2143)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Weekend Vitinia
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Livio Lepri (1999) and Andrea Trebeschi (2143) was played at Weekend Vitinia and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Livio Lepri games or Andrea Trebeschi games? This Livio Lepri vs Andrea Trebeschi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Livio Lepri vs Andrea Trebeschi?
Livio Lepri vs Andrea Trebeschi finished 0–1, a win for Andrea Trebeschi.
What opening was played in Livio Lepri vs Andrea Trebeschi?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Livio Lepri vs Andrea Trebeschi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.