Dawton Almino Lemos vs Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior
2017 · Result 0–1 · King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dawton Almino Lemos vs Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dawton Almino Lemos (2206)
- Black
- Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior (1793)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dawton Almino Lemos (2206) and Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior (1793) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dawton Almino Lemos games or Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior games? This Dawton Almino Lemos vs Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dawton Almino Lemos vs Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior?
Dawton Almino Lemos vs Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior.
What opening was played in Dawton Almino Lemos vs Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior?
The game opened with the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (ECO C44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dawton Almino Lemos vs Marcelo Valeriano Silva Junior, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.