Alexandre Lemire Paquin vs Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps
Quebec Ch U20, 2006 · Result 0–1 · Benoni Defense (A61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandre Lemire Paquin vs Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandre Lemire Paquin (1979)
- Black
- Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps (2047)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Quebec Ch U20
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Benoni Defense (A61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandre Lemire Paquin (1979) and Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps (2047) was played at Quebec Ch U20 in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benoni Defense (A61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandre Lemire Paquin games or Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps games? This Alexandre Lemire Paquin vs Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandre Lemire Paquin vs Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps?
Alexandre Lemire Paquin vs Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps (2006) finished 0–1, a win for Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps.
What opening was played in Alexandre Lemire Paquin vs Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense (ECO A61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandre Lemire Paquin vs Jean-Marc Benoit-Deschamps, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.