Rafael Leitao vs Mario Augusto Galati
Cuiaba BRA, CONTAUD Open 2014, 2014 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System (E41).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rafael Leitao vs Mario Augusto Galati with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rafael Leitao (2645)
- Black
- Mario Augusto Galati (2135)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Cuiaba BRA, CONTAUD Open 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System (E41)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rafael Leitao (2645) and Mario Augusto Galati (2135) was played at Cuiaba BRA, CONTAUD Open 2014 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System (E41). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rafael Leitao games or Mario Augusto Galati games? This Rafael Leitao vs Mario Augusto Galati encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rafael Leitao vs Mario Augusto Galati?
Rafael Leitao vs Mario Augusto Galati (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Rafael Leitao.
What opening was played in Rafael Leitao vs Mario Augusto Galati?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System (ECO E41).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rafael Leitao vs Mario Augusto Galati, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.