Janine Leinenbach vs Nadine Stitterich
2008 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Janine Leinenbach vs Nadine Stitterich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Janine Leinenbach (1655)
- Black
- Nadine Stitterich (1888)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Janine Leinenbach (1655) and Nadine Stitterich (1888) was played in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Janine Leinenbach games or Nadine Stitterich games? This Janine Leinenbach vs Nadine Stitterich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Janine Leinenbach vs Nadine Stitterich?
Janine Leinenbach vs Nadine Stitterich (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Nadine Stitterich.
What opening was played in Janine Leinenbach vs Nadine Stitterich?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (ECO E84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Janine Leinenbach vs Nadine Stitterich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.