Erhard Leimeister vs Roland Schmitt
2008 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Erhard Leimeister vs Roland Schmitt with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Erhard Leimeister (2165)
- Black
- Roland Schmitt (1910)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Erhard Leimeister (2165) and Roland Schmitt (1910) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Erhard Leimeister games or Roland Schmitt games? This Erhard Leimeister vs Roland Schmitt encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Erhard Leimeister vs Roland Schmitt?
Erhard Leimeister vs Roland Schmitt (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Erhard Leimeister.
What opening was played in Erhard Leimeister vs Roland Schmitt?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (ECO E65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Erhard Leimeister vs Roland Schmitt, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.