Petri Lehtivaara vs Tapio Lauronen
Naantali FIN, Open 2012, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Petri Lehtivaara vs Tapio Lauronen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Petri Lehtivaara (2309)
- Black
- Tapio Lauronen (2079)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Naantali FIN, Open 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Petri Lehtivaara (2309) and Tapio Lauronen (2079) was played at Naantali FIN, Open 2012 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Petri Lehtivaara games or Tapio Lauronen games? This Petri Lehtivaara vs Tapio Lauronen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Petri Lehtivaara vs Tapio Lauronen?
Petri Lehtivaara vs Tapio Lauronen (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Petri Lehtivaara.
What opening was played in Petri Lehtivaara vs Tapio Lauronen?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Petri Lehtivaara vs Tapio Lauronen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.