Patrick Lehnen vs Rudolf Hofer
AUT/MT-Rado/1-2 (AUT), 2010 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patrick Lehnen vs Rudolf Hofer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patrick Lehnen (2115)
- Black
- Rudolf Hofer (1797)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- AUT/MT-Rado/1-2 (AUT)
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patrick Lehnen (2115) and Rudolf Hofer (1797) was played at AUT/MT-Rado/1-2 (AUT) in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patrick Lehnen games or Rudolf Hofer games? This Patrick Lehnen vs Rudolf Hofer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patrick Lehnen vs Rudolf Hofer?
Patrick Lehnen vs Rudolf Hofer (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Patrick Lehnen vs Rudolf Hofer?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (ECO D19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patrick Lehnen vs Rudolf Hofer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.