Jochen Lehmensick vs Ehrenfried Oldach
2010 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense (E31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jochen Lehmensick vs Ehrenfried Oldach with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jochen Lehmensick (2188)
- Black
- Ehrenfried Oldach (2072)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense (E31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jochen Lehmensick (2188) and Ehrenfried Oldach (2072) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense (E31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jochen Lehmensick games or Ehrenfried Oldach games? This Jochen Lehmensick vs Ehrenfried Oldach encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jochen Lehmensick vs Ehrenfried Oldach?
Jochen Lehmensick vs Ehrenfried Oldach (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Ehrenfried Oldach.
What opening was played in Jochen Lehmensick vs Ehrenfried Oldach?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense (ECO E31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jochen Lehmensick vs Ehrenfried Oldach, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.