Vladislav Lefebr vs Viacheslav Kosov
2013 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladislav Lefebr vs Viacheslav Kosov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladislav Lefebr (2091)
- Black
- Viacheslav Kosov (2065)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladislav Lefebr (2091) and Viacheslav Kosov (2065) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladislav Lefebr games or Viacheslav Kosov games? This Vladislav Lefebr vs Viacheslav Kosov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladislav Lefebr vs Viacheslav Kosov?
Vladislav Lefebr vs Viacheslav Kosov (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vladislav Lefebr vs Viacheslav Kosov?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (ECO D68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladislav Lefebr vs Viacheslav Kosov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.