Hans Leeflang vs Jannes Van der Wal
Nederland tt, 1994 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hans Leeflang vs Jannes Van der Wal with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hans Leeflang
- Black
- Jannes Van der Wal (2330)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Nederland tt
- Year
- 1994
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hans Leeflang and Jannes Van der Wal (2330) was played at Nederland tt in 1994 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hans Leeflang games or Jannes Van der Wal games? This Hans Leeflang vs Jannes Van der Wal encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hans Leeflang vs Jannes Van der Wal?
Hans Leeflang vs Jannes Van der Wal (1994) finished 1–0, a win for Hans Leeflang.
What opening was played in Hans Leeflang vs Jannes Van der Wal?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (ECO B93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hans Leeflang vs Jannes Van der Wal, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.