Sophie Leclerc vs Daniel Edward Parmet
FICGS__CHESS__TEAM_EVENT_TABLE_3__000001, 2009 · Result 0–1 · Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (A03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sophie Leclerc vs Daniel Edward Parmet with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sophie Leclerc (1573)
- Black
- Daniel Edward Parmet (1941)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__TEAM_EVENT_TABLE_3__000001
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (A03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sophie Leclerc (1573) and Daniel Edward Parmet (1941) was played at FICGS__CHESS__TEAM_EVENT_TABLE_3__000001 in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (A03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sophie Leclerc games or Daniel Edward Parmet games? This Sophie Leclerc vs Daniel Edward Parmet encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Bird Opening: Dutch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sophie Leclerc vs Daniel Edward Parmet?
Sophie Leclerc vs Daniel Edward Parmet (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Edward Parmet.
What opening was played in Sophie Leclerc vs Daniel Edward Parmet?
The game opened with the Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (ECO A03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sophie Leclerc vs Daniel Edward Parmet, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.