Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal vs Fernando De Carvalho Machado
2011 · Result ½–½ · Old Indian Defense (A53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal vs Fernando De Carvalho Machado with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal (2142)
- Black
- Fernando De Carvalho Machado (1857)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Old Indian Defense (A53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal (2142) and Fernando De Carvalho Machado (1857) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Old Indian Defense (A53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal games or Fernando De Carvalho Machado games? This Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal vs Fernando De Carvalho Machado encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Old Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal vs Fernando De Carvalho Machado?
Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal vs Fernando De Carvalho Machado (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal vs Fernando De Carvalho Machado?
The game opened with the Old Indian Defense (ECO A53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo Tarcisio Garcia Leal vs Fernando De Carvalho Machado, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.